BREAKING LEAK: DEEP STATE PROSECUTORS UNDERMINE DOJ INVESTIGATION INTO CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS
In a shocking turn of events, sources reveal that entrenched ‘career’ prosecutors in the Western District of Virginia are actively undermining the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) investigation into the alleged destruction of classified documents by the FBI under President Biden. This investigation centers around the potential use of ‘burn bags’ to secretly eliminate evidence that could implicate former FBI Director James Comey and ex-CIA Director John Brennan.

The DOJ is scrutinizing claims that, during Biden’s presidency, the FBI took steps to obliterate documents that could shed light on the controversial Russia collusion narrative. Reports indicate that Kash Patel, a prominent figure in the investigation, uncovered thousands of documents linked to the Russia hoax stashed in these burn bags within a hidden room at FBI headquarters. Notably, one of these documents is part of the classified annex to Special Counsel John Durham’s report, which has recently been declassified and made public by Senator Chuck Grassley.

The situation escalated further when it was revealed that the previous Trump-appointed Interim US Attorney, Todd Gilbert, was ousted after refusing to dismiss a high-ranking prosecutor who deemed the evidence in the burn bags case as ‘flimsy.’ This turmoil within the DOJ has led to a new US Attorney taking charge of the investigation, prompting the career prosecutors to leak damaging information to the media, particularly The New York Times.

In a recent article, the Times reported that these prosecutors do not believe that any criminal charges are warranted against the FBI officials involved in the destruction of the documents. This sentiment raises eyebrows, especially given the context of the ongoing investigation, which seeks to challenge the FBI’s previous inquiries into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Anonymous sources close to the case have suggested that the investigation is being directed specifically by Kash Patel, leading to further scrutiny and backlash against him from within the DOJ ranks. This kind of internal conflict highlights the deep-seated divides within the agency, as career prosecutors appear to align themselves with the interests of the FBI rather than pursuing accountability.

As this story develops, it becomes increasingly clear that the battle over the narrative surrounding the Russia investigation and the actions of the FBI during the 2016 election is far from over. With leaks emerging and pressures mounting, the integrity of the DOJ’s investigation hangs in the balance, raising concerns about political influence and the so-called ‘Deep State’ attempting to protect its own.